-
sport 4u
- 4 stars Rating: 65
220 votes total - All-State
- (54)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Crimson Empire
- 5 stars Rating: 90
2283 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (1883)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
zigzag ●
- 4 stars Rating: 63
2119 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (1073)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
sport 4u said...
I expect us to go 4 wide a lot next yearzigzag said...
Our typical offensive sets utilize 2 or 3-WRs. Yes, I acknowledge we have several receivers who are phenomenal & need to be in the game. Yet, I don't see the need to forgo our TE, just to put that 4th WR in the game - especially, when OJ Howard is on our team.Crimson_Ghost
- 5 stars Rating: 81
2134 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (3900)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
zigzag ●
- 4 stars Rating: 63
2119 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (1073)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
zigzag said...
Obviously, it's easier to keep defenses guessing when you've got 2-WRs, a TE and an HB in the game. Not to say we can't run out of a 4-WR set, it just seems to be more of a passing only set for us. I really don't recall us going with 4-wides much last season, or the year before - not because our WR corps isn't as deep as present, but because we're more multiple as an offense when we have a TE and HB in the set.
Crimson_Ghost
- 5 stars Rating: 81
2134 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (3900)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of BamaOnLine only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
Crimson Empire
- 5 stars Rating: 90
2283 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (1883)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars

Bama Recievers