-
robert1975 said...
Hmm, last year's 4 last at large bids, BYU (small conference, not considered a small school), Iona (small school), South Florida (big East School), and California (PAC12 school)
I know the selling point the NCAA used for expanding the tourney was to appease the "Little Man" but in actuallity the "Little Man" was taking up to many of the NCAA spots that used to go to big schools or big conferences the past 5 or 6 years so the NCAA expanded the field so more of the bigger schools would get bids.
Watch what the NCAA does, not what it says.
jimtom27486 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 83
2593 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (2562)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
IvoryTusk
- 4 stars Rating: 79
999 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (893)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
robert1975
- 4 stars Rating: 75
745 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (1031)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BoomsMD said...
Its not different hater. You play them games you are scheduled. You cannot control how good the opposition is going to be from year to year. So YOU get off of that bullshit. The man is winning games irrespective your competition argument. Hell, the rest of college basketball is down because some teams are not as talented as some of their school's prior teams.
All of you are just haters and don't understand a damn thing about what's going on and refuse to see the realities of our basketball program inherited by CAG during this time period.
Yes, we can be better. We will be better. Why don't some of you great critics and love-seat sofa coaches apply for a job at ANY D-1 university. Get hired and show us what you got. If you are not capable of doing that, why don't you go sire some offspring with the genetic makeup to provide us with some BAMA loving skilled big men and dead-on sharp shooters and deft point guards.
You keep throwing out numbers. You can make numbers say what you want. But, at the end of the day, the ONLY numbers that really matters are the W-Ls. When we win a defensive battle in football, we run around thumping our chests. When we win a football game, despite being bested in most statistical categories, we tell the other school's fans BUT WE WON where it counts.
***Can you say forked-tongue? Double-standards? Wolf in sheep's clothing? Hoodied one? Hater?
Just ridiculous nonsense with some of these anti-CAG folks...
As a CAG supporter, I am the first to say that WE need to get MUCH better. I EXPECT that he will recruit, develop, retain and graduate better basketball players, men and students. I EXPECT a basketball program that WINS big games and advances into the 2nd and 3rd weekends of the NCAA tournament.
However, I do NOT look at where our basketball program is in a vacuum. We will get there with CAG or we won't. If he is not doing the things that keeps the program moving forward, he will be sent packing. The administration, CAG, players and overall basketball program NEED all of the haters and bandwagon fans to take your NEGATIVE energy and convert it to positive energy and let it reign on the players at the games and in the streets. Help create an atmosphere that will assist CAG in convincing top recruits to trust him with their careers. If better talent comes to the Capstone that is further advanced in their skills and play-making, we will win consistently and keep a pipeline of players that want to continue to attend the University of Alabama and create a legacy and culture comparable to the football program.
Get on your job and off of your negative nanny soap-box!
DISCLAIMER: IvoryTusk most of this is not necessarily directed at you.
Wheeler1000
- 5 stars Rating: 84
891 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (971)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
PepaSpray
- 5 stars Rating: 81
896 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (737)
- 8 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Theta
- 4 stars Rating: 80
6014 votes total - Only In A Jeep
- Hall of Famer
- (12395)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TheTradition
- 5 stars Rating: 93
407 votes total - All-American
- (262)
- 9 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
zigzag
- 4 stars Rating: 63
2120 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (1077)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BuriedAlive14
- 5 stars Rating: 89
2753 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (2315)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
IvoryTusk said...
Mike Anderson took over a putrid Arkansas team, who had been worse than Alabama over the last 5 years. In 2 years he has beaten 4 legit top 25 teams. He did all of that with only one holdover from the previous staff, Powell, being decent. His team this year has no seniors and brings in a big time recruiting class. They are a bubble team like us, but his teams have improved greatly from the 18-13 team he inherited. He's done all of this while have a young PG run the point for two years. Kind of like Alabama. The defense has improved and the offense has improved a ton in that span. It can be done people in under 4 years. I guarantee in year 3 they will be a force.
This post was edited by UAgrad09 on 3/3/2013 at 9:22 PM
UAgrad09
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1074 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (921)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
IvoryTusk
- 4 stars Rating: 79
999 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (893)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
IvoryTusk said...
Lol man I love these posts! It's like if you compare Grant to anybody and it shines him in a negative light then we're not fans. I was pointing out Anderson had drastically changed Arkansas in a very short period, and no he didn't need 5 years to do it. Year 2 they became a bubble team, by year 3 I expect them to be a tourney team while maintaining that success. Anderson has proven his track record twice before.
This post was edited by UAgrad09 on 3/3/2013 at 9:29 PM
UAgrad09
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1074 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (921)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Brian Henry
- 5 stars Rating: 88
270 votes total - All-American
- (350)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Brian Henry said...
Why do people accuse anyone who isn't sure Grant is the long term answer as being "fair weather" or "gumps" or "not knowing basketball"?
Most of the people with reservations about Grant went to the University and went to a hundred basketball games while there and have watched every game sense.
You are just being silly if you think there aren't two sides to this discussion and feeling either way makes you dumb or a bad fan.
This post was edited by UAbasspro on 3/3/2013 at 9:49 PM
UAbasspro
- 5 stars Rating: 86
5656 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (4619)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Brian Henry
- 5 stars Rating: 88
270 votes total - All-American
- (350)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Brian Henry said...
I think we all need to come to a firm conclusion on what our expectations are for our program (which I thought we did during the end of the CMG era). Mine are :
- SEC title every 5-10 years, compete for the top 3-4 every year
- NCAA 75% of years w/ runs to sweet 16 with certain teams built for it (every 3-4 years)
- Top 50 RPI teams 75% of yearsIs that too much to ask at Alabama? Maybe, but I think we can find the right guy who agrees those are reasonable goals, and my guess is Coach Grant would say those are reasonable goals.
jimtom27486 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 83
2593 votes total - Hall of Famer
- (2562)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Theta
- 4 stars Rating: 80
6014 votes total - Only In A Jeep
- Hall of Famer
- (12395)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars










CAG better in yr2-4 than Wimp! Facts warning...