In partnership with CBSSports.com
The No. 1 'Bama fan community on the Internet
BOL message board for off-topic posts
Tailgating, recipes, cooking, food & drink
Buy, sell or swap tickets
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
This comparison was done based on how long Pienkel has been head coach at Mizzou only.... LINKED NOW...my bad
A look at how Missouri matches up with the rest of the Southeastern Conference and how the Tigers future schedule would look.
This post was edited by bamaku 3 years ago
God, give me patience today. If given strength I may beat someone to death.
I found it.
Really wish we were indeed 2-0 in SEC Championships in the last 10 years...
NOT directed at the OP, but the article itself is based on flawed logic. You can't take Mizzou's record in the Big 12 and say what that would have made them in the SEC. 8-4 against the Big 12 is 6-6 against the SEC.
That's what's pasa!
yeah it was a loose comparison but really all you can go on and probably pretty close to where they would fall in the middle of the bunch
BeastlyTide said... (original post)NOT directed at the OP, but the article itself is based on flawed logic. You can't take Mizzou's record in the Big 12 and say what that would have made them in the SEC. 8-4 against the Big 12 is 6-6 against the SEC.
BeastlyTide said... (original post)
It's the week to week toll that makes the SEC so difficult and differentiates itself from everyone else. Honestly you have to have our kind of depth and talent just to survive and get 9-10 wins unlike the Big12. I'm not saying the Big12 isn't good but they are definitley not the SEC. Mizzou should subtract 2 wins per season over the last 10 years and that would be more accurate in terms of how they would have finished in the SEC.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports