Online Now 1761

BOL Round Table

The No. 1 'Bama fan community on the Internet

On this Board 1198
Record: 6133 (1/15/2013)

Online now 1865
Record: 9097 (3/2/2012)

Boards ▾

BOL Round Table

The No. 1 'Bama fan community on the Internet

The Water Cooler

BOL message board for off-topic posts

Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

Rashard Mendenhall opened his big mouth, insert foot....

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
    signature image signature image signature image

    "We're modern-day gladiators, and that mental toughness is really important to have in a good team." Nick Saban

    samdog91

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    BamaXRay

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    FortWorthTide

  • tidesmiles said...

    Give me a break.....care to enlighten us as to who attacked the Towers? Actually don't even worry about it, it'll be to absurd and will only make you look like a bigger fool

    The following is from the right frame on the website I linked in my previous post: http://ae911truth.org/

    As seen in this revealing photo, the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:

    1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
    2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
    3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
    4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
    5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally
    6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
    7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
    8. 1200-foot-diameter debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
    9. Isolated explosive ejections 20–40 stories below demolition front
    10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
    11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
    12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples
    13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

    And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

    1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
    2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
    3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
    4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer-lasting fires have never collapsed.

    This post was edited by Tide96 on 5/3/2011 at 11:47 PM

    Tide96

  • And here is some more from the right frame of the website http://ae911truth.org/ regarding WTC building 7 which was not hit by an airplane.

    WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

    1. Rapid onset of collapse

    2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second before the building's destruction

    3. Symmetrical "structural failure" – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall acceleration

    4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint

    5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

    6. Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional

    7. Foreknowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

    In the the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:

    8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples

    9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses

    10. Chemical signature of the incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples

    WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire:

    1. Slow onset with large visible deformations

    2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)

    3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

    4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed.

    This post was edited by Tide96 on 5/3/2011 at 11:47 PM

    Tide96

  • Even though my own investigation has been extremely cursory, I learned better than to believe that backward Muslims living in caves managed to come into the country and train to fly jumbo jets without raising the slightest eyebrow from the FBI and the like and hijack them while NORAD stood down and crash them like stunt pilots into buildings that were made specifically to withstand impact from slightly smaller planes and that the fires from the jet fuel caused the buildings to collapse at nearly freefall (acceleration due to gravity ) speed.

    When you add to that nanothermite (extremely small particles of military grade explosive) were found in the debris and the fact that WTC building 7 collapsed without being hit by a plane the evidence just screams that the official story about 9/11 is a lie.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Tide96 on 5/4/2011 at 12:05 AM

    Tide96

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    BamaXRay

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
    signature image signature image signature image

    justlike92

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
    signature image signature image signature image

    iwasrunning

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    crmzn

  • Tide96 said...

    Even though my own investigation has been extremely cursory, I learned better than to believe that backward Muslims living in caves managed to come into the country and train to fly jumbo jets without raising the slightest eyebrow from the FBI and the like and hijack them while NORAD stood down and crash them like stunt pilots into buildings that were made specifically to withstand impact from slightly smaller planes and that the fires from the jet fuel caused the buildings to collapse at nearly freefall (acceleration due to gravity ) speed.

    When you add to that nanothermite (extremely small particles of military grade explosive) were found in the debris and the fact that WTC building 7 collapsed without being hit by a plane the evidence just screams that the official story about 9/11 is a lie.

    Well, at least you are proving that all countries have their fair share of nutjobs...

    Bama_Lefty

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    SteamyRay_dup

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    SteamyRay_dup

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    DrHartman

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
    signature image

    menichols74

  • jayman1974 the same holds true for entertainers.

    jfbama

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    Huskypup

  • Tide96 said...

    Even though my own investigation has been extremely cursory, I learned better than to believe that backward Muslims living in caves managed to come into the country and train to fly jumbo jets without raising the slightest eyebrow from the FBI and the like and hijack them while NORAD stood down and crash them like stunt pilots into buildings that were made specifically to withstand impact from slightly smaller planes and that the fires from the jet fuel caused the buildings to collapse at nearly freefall (acceleration due to gravity ) speed.

    When you add to that nanothermite (extremely small particles of military grade explosive) were found in the debris and the fact that WTC building 7 collapsed without being hit by a plane the evidence just screams that the official story about 9/11 is a lie.

    Do you really believe this, or are you just stirring the pot?

    If you do, please answer my questions:
    1. If they didn't fly the planes into the buildings, you did?
    2. If our government did it, why?
    3. Why would they blow up the buildings after being hit by the planes?

    confused

    TideRollinginGA

  • I think that if he had someone die in those attacks he might be singing a different tune. Just being dumb and arrogant.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Bolden1983

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
    signature image

    Thehit86

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
    signature image signature image signature image

    tyde13

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
    signature image

    BB2One

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    DavidPhares

  • tyde13 said...

    This is the down-side to having freedom of speech.

    A tiny, tiny downside, if it's one at all.

    RM makes some stupid comments, but also he does raise some good points... which are unfortunately lost completely because people hone in on the most outrageous statements.

    I assume there are a lot of Christians on this board: who among you can argue with these statements:

    "I believe in God. I believe we're ALL his children. And I believe HE is the ONE and ONLY judge."

    "Those who judge others, will also be judged themselves."

    "For those of you who said you want to see Bin Laden burn ... I ask how would God feel about your heart?"

    I have to admit, I'm a bit turned off by the people dancing in the streets celebrating the death of bin Laden... just as I was when I saw people dancing in the streets in Muslim countires after 9/11. I feel a sense of closure; that justice has been done, but I take no "joy" in bin Laden's death. The fact is we lost a lot of Americans on 9/11, and have subsequently spent trillions, lost thousands more servicemen, and have killed tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghanis that will help to perpetuate this cycle of violence... the whole goddamn thing is a tragedy; a complete mess. So I just don't get someone who has joy in their heart about any element of this.

    His other tweet:

    "What kind of person celebrates death? It's amazing how people can HATE a man they have never even heard speak. We've only heard one side..."

    I am right with him (see my previous paragraph) on people who celebrate death. As for the second part, we Americans have shown a complete inability to empathize with the rest of the world. We take zero responsibility for how our foreign policy and meddling in the Middle East affects the populations of those countries, and leads to their hatred of us. We see 9/11 as a horrific act, and it most certainly was. But we see the deaths of innocent Afghanis as a sad necessity of a greater good... but we never stop to think about how the Afghanis see it. Does it hurt less to lose a loved one to a predator missle strike than to lose them in a plane crashing into a building? We've likely created the Osama bin Laden of the next generation already,and we'll condemn him when he arises, without ever examining WHY he'll choose to become a terrorrist, or what his personal 9/11 moment was.

    Mendenhall is looney. But you guys shouldn't miss this opportunity to think a bit on some of his points.

    PLB1982

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    APBamaMan