Online Now 2082

BOL Round Table

The No. 1 'Bama fan community on the Internet

On this Board 1382
Record: 6133 (1/15/2013)

Online now 2078
Record: 9097 (3/2/2012)

Boards ▾

BOL Round Table

The No. 1 'Bama fan community on the Internet

The Water Cooler

BOL message board for off-topic posts

Ticket Exchange

Buy, sell or swap tickets

Reply

The Drop in Attendance and Crowd Support for Basketball

  • You can't expect it to get better when you lose to Mercer, Tulane and Dayton at home in your fourth year and your offensive production has gone down every year the last four years.

    The fans will probably start fresh next year but if there is no progress expect the same. They probably also need to look at the season ticket issues that many Bama fans have brought up. There is a history of solid basketball support.

    Sorry to rehash what has been talked about verbatim on here the last few weeks.

    Tiderfl

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    jbcbama

  • Tiderfl said...

    You can't expect it to get better when you lose to Mercer, Tulane and Dayton at home in your fourth year and your offensive production has gone down every year the last four years.

    The fans will probably start fresh next year but if there is no progress expect the same. They probably also need to look at the season ticket issues that many Bama fans have brought up. There is a history of solid basketball support.

    Sorry to rehash what has been talked about verbatim on here the last few weeks.

    We have traditionally not filled the seats in out of conference games. Memphis came to town in the middle of our 5 year tournament run. It was a top 15 team matchup. The official attendance? 4522.

    The support is stale and it will be that way unless we achieve some serious sustained success.

    Having no big home matchups this season did not help. Hell, Saturday is just our second home saturday SEC game.

    I used to argue that we need to put students the full length of the floor, but that is never going to happen. I went to one gymnastics meet when I was at Bama. It was Bama vs. Georgia. We lost, but the atmosphere was amazing. I remember being pretty pissed how the students showed up in full force and packed their sections well before the meet started.

    Our bball fan support is extremely lacking. Sustained success is the only cure.

    BGZATUA

  • BGZATUA said...

    We have traditionally not filled the seats in out of conference games. Memphis came to town in the middle of our 5 year tournament run. It was a top 15 team matchup. The official attendance? 4522.

    The support is stale and it will be that way unless we achieve some serious sustained success.

    Having no big home matchups this season did not help. Hell, Saturday is just our second home saturday SEC game.

    I used to argue that we need to put students the full length of the floor, but that is never going to happen. I went to one gymnastics meet when I was at Bama. It was Bama vs. Georgia. We lost, but the atmosphere was amazing. I remember being pretty pissed how the students showed up in full force and packed their sections well before the meet started.

    Our bball fan support is extremely lacking. Sustained success is the only cure.

    How about sustained sucess and a coach that cares whether there is a crowd. Honestly at times I think Grant would rather play with no fans. What does he do on a daily basis to invigorate the program? I can guarentee you that Gymnastics and Softball, two teams with no tradition before there current coaches got there, worked tirelessly to build a fan base. Grant's been here 4 years. He could have had the student section moved. He had that much clout early on, he didn't care. People on here keep acting like that if we got rid of Grant we would go so far backwards. Do people realize that since hiring him, we actually have done just that. If Grant doesn't win one NCAA tournament game here, it will be the worst 4 year stretch of any coach in the modern tournament era for bama. Yes people I judge success not on meaningless 20 win seasons in a bad conference, hell Andy Kennedy has 5 20 win seasons in 6 years at Ole Miss and I would fire him on the spot, but instead I judge it on 3 criteria. 1. Conference Championships: None in 4 years. 2. SEC Tourney Titles: None in 4 years. 3. NCAA Tournaments and Success: 1 Tourney, in the newly expanded Tournament and ZERO wins in 4 years if he doesn't get one this year. All while making 7.6 million in those years. In contrast we paid Gottfried around 750 K in his first 4 years. For 3 million over 4 years we got and SEC Title, and an NCAA Win. In Hobbs last 4 years of coach we paid him just under 2.5 million, and he still had at least one NCAA win.

    signature image signature image

    IvoryTusk

  • That would help too. Sustained success is the key though. That or topless crimsonettes.

    BGZATUA

  • When the coach does not engage the fanbase and the product is mediocre, you get apathetic fans and I dont see how that is going to change. Add to this the fact that we are not in good physical condition and the 5 minute lulls will continue as we cant sustain consistent effort. I dont see CAG becoming an enthusiastic type of person. His voice never changes, his facial expression never changes. He seldon smiles and certainly never laughs that I have seen. He has no personality and everyone feeds off that. The fanbase/team is a reflection of the head coach and you see the zombie-like way in which the players play and the fans cheer. Its sad to see what it has become.

    Remeber how electric CC was when we used to play Arky in the early to mid 90's? Or Kentucky all the way back from the 70's through the Pitino run? The support is there but it has been buried alive. It seems like CAG is a giant sinkhole and we have all fallen in...Help!

    Gottaluvthetide

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    A One

  • BGZATUA said...

    We have traditionally not filled the seats in out of conference games. Memphis came to town in the middle of our 5 year tournament run. It was a top 15 team matchup. The official attendance? 4522.

    The support is stale and it will be that way unless we achieve some serious sustained success.

    Having no big home matchups this season did not help. Hell, Saturday is just our second home saturday SEC game.

    I used to argue that we need to put students the full length of the floor, but that is never going to happen. I went to one gymnastics meet when I was at Bama. It was Bama vs. Georgia. We lost, but the atmosphere was amazing. I remember being pretty pissed how the students showed up in full force and packed their sections well before the meet started.

    Our bball fan support is extremely lacking. Sustained success is the only cure.

    That Memphis game is not a good example. It didn't start till 9:00 on a weeknight. The placed was packed for the Georgetown game last year and it started at 6 or 7 on a weeknight. That makes a big difference. If we get some good "name" teams in non conference people will show up.

    We got completely screwed by the SEC schedule makers this year though. We only got one shot at the top dogs in the league and only one of them was a home game.

    Getting over 10,000 to a game on a weeknight for anybody other than Kentucky is basically all that has ever happened the last 10 years. Sure some games pull more and some pull less, but on average thats what it is. That is down this year because we got some really crappy games at home and team performance is lacking.

    Somebody in the athletic department needs to figure out some way to get more people to the games consistently and fix the seating issue. Too many times lower seats are empty. The student section is always empty. And of course it is. They have some of the worst seats in the house. It's not like the athletic department is broke. Give free stuff away. Whatever happened to the free food before the game? Whatever happened to the bobbleheads to the first however many fans? I remember one year we all got free lunchboxes of the 2002 SEC Championship team, I still have mine somewhere. Somebody has dropped the ball over the years.

    This post was edited by scott713h on 3/7/2013 at 9:28 AM

    scott713h

  • i have come to terms with the fact that there is zero chance grant gets fired this year. i just hope if things arent much better next year that it will be the end of this era

    signature image signature image signature image

    rolBAMAballs

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    BGZATUA

  • Gottaluvthetide said...

    When the coach does not engage the fanbase and the product is mediocre, you get apathetic fans and I dont see how that is going to change. Add to this the fact that we are not in good physical condition and the 5 minute lulls will continue as we cant sustain consistent effort. I dont see CAG becoming an enthusiastic type of person. His voice never changes, his facial expression never changes. He seldon smiles and certainly never laughs that I have seen. He has no personality and everyone feeds off that. The fanbase/team is a reflection of the head coach and you see the zombie-like way in which the players play and the fans cheer. Its sad to see what it has become.

    Remeber how electric CC was when we used to play Arky in the early to mid 90's? Or Kentucky all the way back from the 70's through the Pitino run? The support is there but it has been buried alive. It seems like CAG is a giant sinkhole and we have all fallen in...Help!

    "The 5 minute lulls will continue"

    40 minute lulz IYAM

    bama1235

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    A One

  • IvoryTusk said...

    How about sustained sucess and a coach that cares whether there is a crowd. Honestly at times I think Grant would rather play with no fans. What does he do on a daily basis to invigorate the program? I can guarentee you that Gymnastics and Softball, two teams with no tradition before there current coaches got there, worked tirelessly to build a fan base. Grant's been here 4 years. He could have had the student section moved. He had that much clout early on, he didn't care. People on here keep acting like that if we got rid of Grant we would go so far backwards. Do people realize that since hiring him, we actually have done just that. If Grant doesn't win one NCAA tournament game here, it will be the worst 4 year stretch of any coach in the modern tournament era for bama. Yes people I judge success not on meaningless 20 win seasons in a bad conference, hell Andy Kennedy has 5 20 win seasons in 6 years at Ole Miss and I would fire him on the spot, but instead I judge it on 3 criteria. 1. Conference Championships: None in 4 years. 2. SEC Tourney Titles: None in 4 years. 3. NCAA Tournaments and Success: 1 Tourney, in the newly expanded Tournament and ZERO wins in 4 years if he doesn't get one this year. All while making 7.6 million in those years. In contrast we paid Gottfried around 750 K in his first 4 years. For 3 million over 4 years we got and SEC Title, and an NCAA Win. In Hobbs last 4 years of coach we paid him just under 2.5 million, and he still had at least one NCAA win.

    Why is 4 years your measuring stick?
    (Edited due to misreading your Hobbs point, however Hobbs 4 year record in his last 4 was horrific. I wouldn't trade these four years for those 4 years even with the tournament win.)

    I'm of the opposite opinion than most when it comes to how quickly a coach can turn around a basketball. I believe it takes 5 years and that is due to the recruiting aspect. A coach isn't going to come in and sign great players in his first class most likely. The good seniors are already signed by that time. So his second class is his first. Except that he is way behind on those player too. College basketball has an earlier commit time frame than football due to the early signing period. That being said if the guy can recruit that class should be good but think about that.

    Those players are 5 years from being juniors. You are 5 years from having your guys being the mature leaders on the team.

    That's where we are. We have 1 senior, some remnants of a weak class of juniors and then the bulk of grants big class, his real hand print on the team and program, are sophomores.

    I can find a lot of places where grant needs to improve but I also believe in today's college basketball world a coach needs 5 years as long as he has been adequate.

    Someone like Barbee is another story. They can't win 10 games. We are 2 inexplicable losses from being a tournament team. We were a tournament team last year. We had tremendous nit success 2 years ago. I don't like our results this season but things aren't as bleak as some suggest.

    For the record, I don't like grants lack of passion in games, i wish he did a better job promoting the program, he needs to man up and schedule some marquee games even if it means going on the road and losing, he needs to recruit some skilled shooters to compliment his athletes so we can be more competitive in sec road games whete the physicallity hurts our dribble drive offense, and he needs to show his team he is willing to fight for them instead of acting helpless.

    After year 4 those aren't reasons for a change but they are certainly cause for concern.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by scottchap on 3/7/2013 at 10:01 AM

    scottchap

  • scott713h said...

    That Memphis game is not a good example. It didn't start till 9:00 on a weeknight. The placed was packed for the Georgetown game last year and it started at 6 or 7 on a weeknight. That makes a big difference. If we get some good "name" teams in non conference people will show up.

    We got completely screwed by the SEC schedule makers this year though. We only got one shot at the top dogs in the league and only one of them was a home game.

    Getting over 10,000 to a game on a weeknight for anybody other than Kentucky is basically all that has ever happened the last 10 years. Sure some games pull more and some pull less, but on average thats what it is. That is down this year because we got some really crappy games at home and team performance is lacking.

    Somebody in the athletic department needs to figure out some way to get more people to the games consistently and fix the seating issue. Too many times lower seats are empty. The student section is always empty. And of course it is. They have some of the worst seats in the house. It's not like the athletic department is broke. Give free stuff away. Whatever happened to the free food before the game? Whatever happened to the bobbleheads to the first however many fans? I remember one year we all got free lunchboxes of the 2002 SEC Championship team, I still have mine somewhere. Somebody has dropped the ball over the years.

    I think the best way to get people to games I. Tuscaloosa is to build excitement on TV through playing some marquee teams on the road in what is very likely to be a televised game.

    Then also we have to play the marquee home games on Saturdays. Families can't be heading home from ttown on a Wednesday night at 11 pm.

    scottchap

  • BGZATUA said...

    That would help too. Sustained success is the key though. That or topless crimsonettes.

    Sure to sell out every game.

    RMFT81

  • scottchap said...

    Why is 4 years your measuring stick?

    You say it would be the worst stretch but what does that mean? Like you said Hobbs do better in his first 4 years but was not a good coach. So maybe doing well in your first 4 years isn't a good determinant for future success.

    I'm of the opposite opinion than most when it comes to how quickly a coach can turn around a basketball. I believe it takes 5 years and that is due to the recruiting aspect. A coach isn't going to come in and sign great players in his first class most likely. The good seniors are already signed by that time. So his second class is his first. Except that he is way behind on those player too. College basketball has an earlier commit time frame than football due to the early signing period. That being said if the guy can recruit that class should be good but think about that.

    Those players are 5 years from being juniors. You are 5 years from having your guys being the mature leaders on the team.

    That's where we are. We have 1 senior, some remnants of a weak class of juniors and then the bulk of grants big class, his real hand print on the team and program, are sophomores.

    I can find a lot of places where grant needs to improve but I also believe in today's college basketball world a coach needs 5 years as long as he has been adequate.

    Someone like Barbee is another story. They can't win 10 games. We are 2 inexplicable losses from being a tournament team. We were a tournament team last year. We had tremendous nit success 2 years ago. I don't like our results this season but things aren't as bleak as some suggest.

    For the record, I don't like grants lack of passion in games, i wish he did a better job promoting the program, he needs to man up and schedule some marquee games even if it means going on the road and losing, he needs to recruit some skilled shooters to compliment his athletes so we can be more competitive in sec road games whete the physicallity hurts our dribble drive offense, and he needs to show his team he is willing to fight for them instead of acting helpless.

    After year 4 those aren't reasons for a change but they are certainly cause for concern.

    Honestly if you think it takes 5 years to turn a team around then there is no point arguing with you.

    Teams turned around in under 3 year just to name a few in the last few years.

    Gottfried - NC State, took over a losing program and sweet 16 first year. Tourney team this year.

    Larranga - Miami top 10 team. More wins over top 25 teams in one year than grant in 4 years.

    Mike Anderson- Missouri, first two years mediocre. Elite Eight in 3rd year.

    Tony Bennett - wash st. and Virginia now. Took over losing programs. Advanced to 2nd round in under 3 years with both teams.

    Pearl- Tennessee - took over a losing program, 1st year took team to NCAA 2nd round. 4 tourneys first 4 years

    Shaka smart - VCU final four and sweet 16 in 1st 3 yrs.

    Frank Martin- KSU - hadn't win a NCAA game since 94'. First 3 years elite eight and NCAA 2nd round

    I could keep adding to this list. But you get the idea. Also funny, every single coach on that list is making or was making less money than Grant was when they coached those teams.

    signature image signature image

    IvoryTusk

  • scottchap said...

    Why is 4 years your measuring stick?

    You say it would be the worst stretch but what does that mean? Like you said Hobbs do better in his first 4 years but was not a good coach. So maybe doing well in your first 4 years isn't a good determinant for future success.

    I'm of the opposite opinion than most when it comes to how quickly a coach can turn around a basketball. I believe it takes 5 years and that is due to the recruiting aspect. A coach isn't going to come in and sign great players in his first class most likely. The good seniors are already signed by that time. So his second class is his first. Except that he is way behind on those player too. College basketball has an earlier commit time frame than football due to the early signing period. That being said if the guy can recruit that class should be good but think about that.

    Those players are 5 years from being juniors. You are 5 years from having your guys being the mature leaders on the team.

    That's where we are. We have 1 senior, some remnants of a weak class of juniors and then the bulk of grants big class, his real hand print on the team and program, are sophomores.

    I can find a lot of places where grant needs to improve but I also believe in today's college basketball world a coach needs 5 years as long as he has been adequate.

    Someone like Barbee is another story. They can't win 10 games. We are 2 inexplicable losses from being a tournament team. We were a tournament team last year. We had tremendous nit success 2 years ago. I don't like our results this season but things aren't as bleak as some suggest.

    For the record, I don't like grants lack of passion in games, i wish he did a better job promoting the program, he needs to man up and schedule some marquee games even if it means going on the road and losing, he needs to recruit some skilled shooters to compliment his athletes so we can be more competitive in sec road games whete the physicallity hurts our dribble drive offense, and he needs to show his team he is willing to fight for them instead of acting helpless.

    After year 4 those aren't reasons for a change but they are certainly cause for concern.

    Honestly if you think it takes 5 years to turn a team around then there is no point arguing with you.

    Teams turned around in under 3 year just to name a few in the last few years.

    Gottfried - NC State, took over a losing program and sweet 16 first year. Tourney team this year.

    Larranga - Miami top 10 team. More wins over top 25 teams in one year than grant in 4 years.

    Mike Anderson- Missouri, first two years mediocre. Elite Eight in 3rd year.

    Tony Bennett - wash st. and Virginia now. Took over losing programs. Advanced to 2nd round in under 3 years with both teams.

    Pearl- Tennessee - took over a losing program, 1st year took team to NCAA 2nd round. 4 tourneys first 4 years

    Shaka smart - VCU final four and sweet 16 in 1st 3 yrs.

    Frank Martin- KSU - hadn't win a NCAA game since 94'. First 3 years elite eight and NCAA 2nd round

    I could keep adding to this list. But you get the idea. Also funny, every single coach on that list is making or was making less money than Grant was when they coached those teams.

    signature image signature image

    IvoryTusk

  • scottchap said...

    Why is 4 years your measuring stick?
    (Edited due to misreading your Hobbs point, however Hobbs 4 year record in his last 4 was horrific. I wouldn't trade these four years for those 4 years even with the tournament win.)

    I'm of the opposite opinion than most when it comes to how quickly a coach can turn around a basketball. I believe it takes 5 years and that is due to the recruiting aspect. A coach isn't going to come in and sign great players in his first class most likely. The good seniors are already signed by that time. So his second class is his first. Except that he is way behind on those player too. College basketball has an earlier commit time frame than football due to the early signing period. That being said if the guy can recruit that class should be good but think about that.

    Those players are 5 years from being juniors. You are 5 years from having your guys being the mature leaders on the team.

    That's where we are. We have 1 senior, some remnants of a weak class of juniors and then the bulk of grants big class, his real hand print on the team and program, are sophomores.

    I can find a lot of places where grant needs to improve but I also believe in today's college basketball world a coach needs 5 years as long as he has been adequate.

    Someone like Barbee is another story. They can't win 10 games. We are 2 inexplicable losses from being a tournament team. We were a tournament team last year. We had tremendous nit success 2 years ago. I don't like our results this season but things aren't as bleak as some suggest.

    For the record, I don't like grants lack of passion in games, i wish he did a better job promoting the program, he needs to man up and schedule some marquee games even if it means going on the road and losing, he needs to recruit some skilled shooters to compliment his athletes so we can be more competitive in sec road games whete the physicallity hurts our dribble drive offense, and he needs to show his team he is willing to fight for them instead of acting helpless.

    After year 4 those aren't reasons for a change but they are certainly cause for concern.

    Honestly if you think it takes 5 years to turn a team around then there is no point arguing with you.

    Teams turned around in under 3 year just to name a few in the last few years.

    Gottfried - NC State, took over a losing program and sweet 16 first year. Tourney team this year.

    Larranga - Miami top 10 team. More wins over top 25 teams in one year than grant in 4 years.

    Mike Anderson- Missouri, first two years mediocre. Elite Eight in 3rd year.

    Tony Bennett - wash st. and Virginia now. Took over losing programs. Advanced to 2nd round in under 3 years with both teams.

    Pearl- Tennessee - took over a losing program, 1st year took team to NCAA 2nd round. 4 tourneys first 4 years

    Shaka smart - VCU final four and sweet 16 in 1st 3 yrs.

    Frank Martin- KSU - hadn't win a NCAA game since 94'. First 3 years elite eight and NCAA 2nd round

    I could keep adding to this list. But you get the idea. Also funny, every single coach on that list is making or was making less money than Grant was when they coached those teams.

    signature image signature image

    IvoryTusk

  • IvoryTusk said...

    Honestly if you think it takes 5 years to turn a team around then there is no point arguing with you.

    Teams turned around in under 3 year just to name a few in the last few years.

    Gottfried - NC State, took over a losing program and sweet 16 first year. Tourney team this year.

    Larranga - Miami top 10 team. More wins over top 25 teams in one year than grant in 4 years.

    Mike Anderson- Missouri, first two years mediocre. Elite Eight in 3rd year.

    Tony Bennett - wash st. and Virginia now. Took over losing programs. Advanced to 2nd round in under 3 years with both teams.

    Pearl- Tennessee - took over a losing program, 1st year took team to NCAA 2nd round. 4 tourneys first 4 years

    Shaka smart - VCU final four and sweet 16 in 1st 3 yrs.

    Frank Martin- KSU - hadn't win a NCAA game since 94'. First 3 years elite eight and NCAA 2nd round

    I could keep adding to this list. But you get the idea. Also funny, every single coach on that list is making or was making less money than Grant was when they coached those teams.

    Wait a second here...

    You put VCU, Miami and Kansas St on that list????

    How in the world are those included in your turn around list? All three were jobs where the coach left to take what they perceived to be better jobs because they had been doing well at the school.

    Yes, I say that 5 years is how long it takes to turn around a basketball program. Sure you can have some success in the first few years if the previous coach left you some good players and you get lucky that players don't leave early.

    However, for the most part the coach doesn't have his team in place with his players being experienced leaders till year 5.

    scottchap

  • scottchap said...

    Wait a second here...

    You put VCU, Miami and Kansas St on that list????

    How in the world are those included in your turn around list? All three were jobs where the coach left to take what they perceived to be better jobs because they had been doing well at the school.

    Yes, I say that 5 years is how long it takes to turn around a basketball program. Sure you can have some success in the first few years if the previous coach left you some good players and you get lucky that players don't leave early.

    However, for the most part the coach doesn't have his team in place with his players being experienced leaders till year 5.

    So now you need experienced leaders. Last time I checked Releford has more starts at PG than any other guard in the league other than Boyton at Florida. Lacey, copper and Randolph have all started for over 60 games now. Most players don't hit that level of experience and amount of playing time to their junior or senior years.

    You act as if no team in the country can win with young guys. The youngest team in the league isn't Alabama. It's Arkansas with 0 seniors and a sophomore as the starting pg. Alabama won an sec title with a true freshman at PG, Mo Williams, and a walk on sophomore.

    signature image signature image

    IvoryTusk

  • IvoryTusk said...

    So now you need experienced leaders. Last time I checked Releford has more starts at PG than any other guard in the league other than Boyton at Florida. Lacey, copper and Randolph have all started for over 60 games now. Most players don't hit that level of experience and amount of playing time to their junior or senior years.

    You act as if no team in the country can win with young guys. The youngest team in the league isn't Alabama. It's Arkansas with 0 seniors and a sophomore as the starting pg. Alabama won an sec title with a true freshman at PG, Mo Williams, and a walk on sophomore.

    Arkansas isn't good so why compare us to them? All that proves is my point that having experienced players makes you a better team.

    Also, we have won games. We are almost a tournament team. Had our players been juniors instead of sophomores its conceivable we would be a tournament team. That's what we will be next year in year 5.

    For the record on Mark's turnaround job at NC State, his top 2 scorers are players he didn't recruit and are a senior and junior. We are discussing turning around a program, not winning with the previous coach's players.

    scottchap

  • People aren't coming to Coleman...but it has very little at all to do with weekend vs weeknight home dates. It has nothing to do with quality of the league. It has everything to do with the quality of product on the court and the level of optimism our coach and players are inspiring in our fan base.

    When people openly groan and roll their eyes while watching us play, why would they want to spend their time doing something they've grown to hate? I hate to admit that I left Tuesday's game at the Under 8 timeout because I simply couldn't take any more. It was disgusting to watch. I spent as much time getting to and from the game as I did watching it, and it was excruciating at times. Bottom line: I had looked forward to it for weeks, and it was a miserable experience watching such incompetent basketball. Like a junkie, I'll keep coming back for more. But most fans won't.

    If you don't think we've supported Grant, check the video below. Coleman seems pretty exciting to me. That was two years ago. It's sad watching that and seeing the talent/energy disparity then vs now. We had a somewhat serviceable shooter (C Davis,) big men who busted their butts for the most part (Hines and Green) and a wing man who could actually create his own offense (Mitchell.) Oh...and our point guard was actually playing point guard then, too. The play in the video is probably more exciting than anything we've seen out of this current team all year.

    Play

    Trevor Releford to Tony Mitchell alley oop!

    Off a steal, Bama freshmen PG Trevor Releford throws an alley oop to Tony Mitchell who throws it down one handed and brings the house down at Coleman Coliseum. Alabama defeated the Arkansas Razorbacks 69-56. RTR!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/v/KEzz0S7mYHs
    signature image

    NashTide

  • Thats because most of yall are bandwagon fans which is very sad.

    signature image

    cj75

    cjrolltide75

  • This post is for members of BamaOnLine or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    A One

  • Actually most of us aren't bandwagon fans. Also will people stop comparing Shula to Grant. It's very insulting to Shula. Heck in 4 yrs Shula even managed to have a team finish in the top 10 in the country. Grant can't even get a team to finish in the top 50 once in his first 4 years as a coach

    signature image signature image

    IvoryTusk